- OP-TEE - lists.trustedfirmware.org

[PATCH] tee: optee: prevent use-after-free when the client exits before the supplicant

by Amirreza Zarrabi

Commit 70b0d6b0a199 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop") made the client wait as killable so it can be interrupted during shutdown or after a supplicant crash. This changes the original lifetime expectations: the client task can now terminate while the supplicant is still processing its request. If the client exits first it removes the request from its queue and kfree()s it, while the request ID remains in supp->idr. A subsequent lookup on the supplicant path then dereferences freed memory, leading to a use-after-free. Serialise access to the request with supp->mutex: * Hold supp->mutex in optee_supp_recv() and optee_supp_send() while looking up and touching the request. * Let optee_supp_thrd_req() notice that the client has terminated and signal optee_supp_send() accordingly. With these changes the request cannot be freed while the supplicant still has a reference, eliminating the race. Fixes: 70b0d6b0a199 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop") Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi(a)oss.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/tee/optee/supp.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c index d0f397c90242..62c9c75f48a6 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ struct optee_supp_req { struct list_head link; + int id; bool in_queue; u32 func; @@ -19,6 +20,9 @@ struct optee_supp_req { struct completion c; }; +/* It is temporary request used for invalid pending request in supp->idr. */ +static struct optee_supp_req invalid_req; + void optee_supp_init(struct optee_supp *supp) { memset(supp, 0, sizeof(*supp)); @@ -102,6 +106,7 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); list_add_tail(&req->link, &supp->reqs); req->in_queue = true; + req->id = -1; mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); /* Tell an eventual waiter there's a new request */ @@ -117,21 +122,40 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params, if (wait_for_completion_killable(&req->c)) { mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); if (req->in_queue) { + /* Supplicant has not seen this request yet. */ list_del(&req->link); req->in_queue = false; + + ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; + } else if (req->id == -1) { + /* + * Supplicant has processed this request. Ignore the + * kill signal for now and submit the result. + */ + ret = req->ret; + } else { + /* + * Supplicant is in the middle of processing this + * request. Replace req with invalid_req so that the ID + * remains busy, causing optee_supp_send() to fail on + * the next call to supp_pop_req() with this ID. + */ + idr_replace(&supp->idr, &invalid_req, req->id); + ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; } + + kfree(req); mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); - req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION; + } else { + ret = req->ret; + kfree(req); } - ret = req->ret; - kfree(req); - return ret; } static struct optee_supp_req *supp_pop_entry(struct optee_supp *supp, - int num_params, int *id) + int num_params) { struct optee_supp_req *req; @@ -153,8 +177,8 @@ static struct optee_supp_req *supp_pop_entry(struct optee_supp *supp, return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } - *id = idr_alloc(&supp->idr, req, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL); - if (*id < 0) + req->id = idr_alloc(&supp->idr, req, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL); + if (req->id < 0) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); list_del(&req->link); @@ -214,7 +238,6 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params, struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(teedev); struct optee_supp *supp = &optee->supp; struct optee_supp_req *req = NULL; - int id; size_t num_meta; int rc; @@ -223,16 +246,45 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params, return rc; while (true) { - mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); - req = supp_pop_entry(supp, *num_params - num_meta, &id); - mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); + scoped_guard(mutex, &supp->mutex) { + req = supp_pop_entry(supp, *num_params - num_meta); + if (!req) + goto wait_for_request; - if (req) { if (IS_ERR(req)) return PTR_ERR(req); - break; + + /* + * Popped a request: process it while holding the lock, + * so that optee_supp_thrd_req() doesn't pull the + * request out from under us. + */ + + if (num_meta) { + /* + * tee-supplicant support meta parameters -> + * requests can be processed asynchronously. + */ + param->attr = + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INOUT | + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_META; + param->u.value.a = req->id; + param->u.value.b = 0; + param->u.value.c = 0; + } else { + supp->req_id = req->id; + } + + *func = req->func; + *num_params = req->num_params + num_meta; + memcpy(param + num_meta, req->param, + sizeof(struct tee_param) * req->num_params); } + /* Check for the next request in the queue. */ + continue; + +wait_for_request: /* * If we didn't get a request we'll block in * wait_for_completion() to avoid needless spinning. @@ -245,27 +297,6 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params, return -ERESTARTSYS; } - if (num_meta) { - /* - * tee-supplicant support meta parameters -> requsts can be - * processed asynchronously. - */ - param->attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INOUT | - TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_META; - param->u.value.a = id; - param->u.value.b = 0; - param->u.value.c = 0; - } else { - mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); - supp->req_id = id; - mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); - } - - *func = req->func; - *num_params = req->num_params + num_meta; - memcpy(param + num_meta, req->param, - sizeof(struct tee_param) * req->num_params); - return 0; } @@ -297,12 +328,21 @@ static struct optee_supp_req *supp_pop_req(struct optee_supp *supp, if (!req) return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); + /* optee_supp_thrd_req() already returned to optee. */ + if (req == &invalid_req) { + req = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); + goto failed_req; + } + if ((num_params - nm) != req->num_params) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + req->id = -1; + *num_meta = nm; +failed_req: idr_remove(&supp->idr, id); supp->req_id = -1; - *num_meta = nm; + return req; } @@ -328,9 +368,8 @@ int optee_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 ret, u32 num_params, mutex_lock(&supp->mutex); req = supp_pop_req(supp, num_params, param, &num_meta); - mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); - if (IS_ERR(req)) { + mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); /* Something is wrong, let supplicant restart. */ return PTR_ERR(req); } @@ -358,6 +397,7 @@ int optee_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 ret, u32 num_params, /* Let the requesting thread continue */ complete(&req->c); + mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex); return 0; } --- base-commit: 3be1a7a31fbda82f3604b6c31e4f390110de1b46 change-id: 20250604-fix-use-after-free-8ff1b5d5d774 Best regards, -- Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi(a)oss.qualcomm.com>

7 months, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

Issue with optee fixing supplicant wait loop

by Amirreza Zarrabi

Hi Jens, Sumit, The following change has recently been merged: tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/70b0d6b0a199c5a3ee6c72f5e61681ed6f…). This fix addresses the issue where the supplicant may terminate before the client due to the shutdown sequence or a crash. However, it introduces a potential new issue - now that the client is killable, what happens if it terminates before the supplicant? During cleanup, the client would remove/free the request, while the request would still be available in the request idr for the supplicant. Although I have not been able to reproduce it, this could theoretically result in a kernel page fault. To address this, there are a few options: (1) Use rcu and access request under a read lock in optee_supp_recv and optee_supp_send. (2) Reuse supp->mutex, ensuring that most of these functions run within the lock, even though it may not always be necessary. Could you confirm whether this behavior was intentional? If not, I am happy to prepare a patch. Additionally, please let me know whether you prefer solution (1) or (2), or if you have any other suggestions. Thank you for your time. Regards, Amir

8 months

2
2
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 4/5] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index 2db144d2d26f3..357944bc73b19 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_drv.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -16,7 +17,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) /* * Unprivileged devices in the lower half range and privileged devices in @@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -398,7 +399,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -532,7 +533,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -631,7 +632,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 4/5] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index 9cc4a7b63b0d6..e6de0e80b793e 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_drv.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) #define TEE_UUID_NS_NAME_SIZE 128 @@ -492,7 +493,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -570,7 +571,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -704,7 +705,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -803,7 +804,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 4/5] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index a44e5b53e7a91..a7e89c229fc51 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_drv.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) #define TEE_UUID_NS_NAME_SIZE 128 @@ -493,7 +494,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -571,7 +572,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -705,7 +706,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -804,7 +805,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 5/6] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index 98da206cd7615..a9a893bc19fa4 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_drv.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) #define TEE_UUID_NS_NAME_SIZE 128 @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -699,7 +700,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -798,7 +799,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 5/6] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index 0eb342de0b001..d7ad16f262b2e 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_drv.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) #define TEE_UUID_NS_NAME_SIZE 128 @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -699,7 +700,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -798,7 +799,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 5/6] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index d113679b1e2d7..acc7998758ad8 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_core.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) #define TEE_UUID_NS_NAME_SIZE 128 @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -699,7 +700,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -798,7 +799,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 7/8] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index d113679b1e2d7..acc7998758ad8 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_core.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) #define TEE_UUID_NS_NAME_SIZE 128 @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -699,7 +700,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -798,7 +799,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 8/9] tee: Prevent size calculation wraparound on 32-bit kernels

by Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 39bb67edcc582b3b386a9ec983da67fa8a10ec03 ] The current code around TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE() is a bit wrong on 32-bit kernels: Multiplying a user-provided 32-bit value with the size of a structure can wrap around on such platforms. Fix it by using saturating arithmetic for the size calculation. This has no security consequences because, in all users of TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(), the subsequent kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Vulnerability Analysis The commit fixes a real integer overflow vulnerability in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) subsystem on 32-bit kernels. The issue occurs in the `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE()` macro defined as: ```c #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) ``` Where `struct tee_ioctl_param` is 32 bytes (4 × 8-byte fields). On 32-bit systems, when a user provides a large `num_params` value, the multiplication `32 * num_params` can wrap around, potentially bypassing buffer length validation checks. ## Specific Vulnerable Code Locations The vulnerable pattern appears in 4 locations in `drivers/tee/tee_core.c`: 1. **Line 490**: `tee_ioctl_open_session()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 2. **Line 568**: `tee_ioctl_invoke()` - `sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len` 3. **Line 702**: `tee_ioctl_supp_recv()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len` 4. **Line 801**: `tee_ioctl_supp_send()` - `sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len` ## Attack Scenario On 32-bit systems, if `num_params = 0x08000000` (134,217,728), then: - `TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(0x08000000) = 32 * 0x08000000 = 0x100000000` - This wraps to `0x00000000` on 32-bit systems - The size validation `sizeof(arg) + 0 != buf.buf_len` could be bypassed - Subsequent `kcalloc()` would allocate a huge buffer, but the size calculations would be wrong ## Why This Should Be Backported **Matches "YES" backport criteria from similar commits:** 1. **Security Fix**: Like Similar Commit #2 (rtl8188eu security hole) and #4 (gup_benchmark integer overflow), this prevents user-controlled integer overflow that could lead to memory corruption. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix uses the kernel's standard `size_add()` and `size_mul()` helpers from `linux/overflow.h` - exactly like Similar Commit #3 which was noted as using `size_add()` for similar protection. 3. **Critical Subsystem**: TEE handles sensitive cryptographic operations and trusted applications, making security fixes here particularly important. 4. **Low Regression Risk**: The fix only adds overflow protection without changing functionality. The `size_mul()` and `size_add()` functions are well- tested kernel overflow helpers. 5. **User-Controllable Input**: The `num_params` value comes directly from user space through ioctl calls, making this a user-triggerable condition. 6. **Clear Security Impact**: While the commit states "no security consequences because kcalloc() implicitly checks for wrapping," this is defense-in-depth - the size validation should not rely on downstream allocation checks. The fix pattern exactly matches Similar Commit #4 (mm/gup_benchmark.c) which was backported for preventing integer overflow in size calculations with user-provided values. This commit follows the same security principle and uses the same overflow-safe arithmetic helpers that the kernel has standardized on for these scenarios. drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c index d113679b1e2d7..acc7998758ad8 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/overflow.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/tee_core.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ #define TEE_NUM_DEVICES 32 -#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct tee_param) * (x)) +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(x) (size_mul(sizeof(struct tee_param), (x))) #define TEE_UUID_NS_NAME_SIZE 128 @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx, if (copy_from_user(&arg, uarg, sizeof(arg))) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(arg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(arg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(arg.num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; if (arg.num_params) { @@ -699,7 +700,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) != buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -798,7 +799,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params)) return -EFAULT; - if (sizeof(*uarg) + TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params) > buf.buf_len) + if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) > buf.buf_len) return -EINVAL; params = kcalloc(num_params, sizeof(struct tee_param), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.39.5

8 months

1
0
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

OP-TEE