Re: [PATCH v12 3/9] tee: implement protected DMA-heap

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 03:49:44PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:

+static const char *heap_id_2_name(enum tee_dma_heap_id id) +{

• switch (id) {
• case TEE_DMA_HEAP_SECURE_VIDEO_PLAY:

• return "protected,secure-video";
  

• case TEE_DMA_HEAP_TRUSTED_UI:

• return "protected,trusted-ui";
  

• case TEE_DMA_HEAP_SECURE_VIDEO_RECORD:

• return "protected,secure-video-record";
  

• default:

• return NULL;
  

• }

+}

We've recently agreed on a naming guideline (even though it's not merged yet)

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250728-dma-buf-heap-names-doc-v4-1-f73f71cf0dfd@...

Secure and trusted should be defined I guess, because secure and protected at least seem redundant to me.

Maxime