Hi Mate,

OK. It's good to know that this is the known issue. I will wait for a final review and merge.

Thanks, Andrej

-----Original Message----- From: TF-M tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org On Behalf Of Mate Toth-Pal via TF-M Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 2:45 PM To: TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org Cc: nd nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [TF-M] TFM Core regression tests

Hi Andrej,

Yes, on the master branch this is a limitation.

I already have a few patches on review to fix this: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freview.tru... https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freview.tru...

They are most probably going to be merged with the secure IRQ handling commits.

You can also cherry pick those for yourself for testing purposes, there should be no conflict, as it is quite independent from the parent commits on review.

Regards, Mate

-----Original Message----- From: TF-M tf-m-bounces@lists.trustedfirmware.org On Behalf Of Andrej Butok via TF-M Sent: 27 March 2019 14:32 To: TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: [TF-M] TFM Core regression tests

Hello

We are trying to enable & compile TFM Core tests. But it looks like they are only for MPS2 platform: 1) tfm_ss_core_test.c: .... #include "smm_mps2.h" ... static psa_status_t test_peripheral_access(void) { struct arm_mps2_fpgaio_t *fpgaio = SEC_MPS2_FPGAIO; ... etc. 2) tfm_partition_list.inc ... #ifdef TFM_PARTITION_TEST_CORE ... PARTITION_ADD_PERIPHERAL(TFM_SP_CORE_TEST, TFM_PERIPHERAL_FPGA_IO); #endif /* TFM_PARTITION_TEST_CORE */ ...

What do you suggest ? What is the plan? Should we to skip/ignore the TFM Core regression tests now?

Thanks

Andrej Butok SW Tech Lead Security & Connectivity, Microcontrollers NXP Semiconductors

-- TF-M mailing list TF-M@lists.trustedfirmware.org https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.trus...