Hi all

Below are some edited AI notes from today's meeting:

Present:

Eric Finco (ST)

Antonio De Angelis (Arm)

Dan Handley (Arm)

Kamlesh Gurudasani (TI)

Frank (Nordic)

David Brown (Linaro)

Joanna Farley (Arm)

Dominik Ermel (Nordic Semi)

The meeting focused on several key topics related to Trusted Firmware development and project policies. The group discussed changing the "co-developed by" tag format in the AI-assisted contributions policy to align with the new Linux project guidelines, with Kamlesh noting that some TF-A patches had already used the "co-developed-by" tag.

The team reviewed a Zephyr interpretation of the CRA (Cyber Resiliency Act) requirements and their implications for vulnerability handling and SBOM generation, though David emphasized the importance of avoiding legal advice in the documentation unless it's been reviewed by a lawyer.

Antonio presented options for creating a separate PSA crypto driver repository on GitHub, with Frank explaining that the main driver was familiarity with GitHub for vendors, though licensing concerns were raised.

The conversation ended with Dan advertising a new Confidential Compute Working Group at CoreCollective that would kick off the following week, initially focusing on CCA reference SW roadmap and CCA attestation enablement.

The team discussed changing the "co-developed by" tag in the AI-assisted contributions policy to align with the new Linux project guidelines, which uses an assisted-by tag with a specific format. The Linux policy is otherwise well aligned. Attributions are optional. Dan proposed sending an offline notification about the proposed change since no objections were raised during the meeting. Kamlesh pointed out that some TF-A patches had already used the "co-developed by" tag. The team agreed this is just for audit purposes so there should be no need to change existing code.

The team discussed a Zephyr analysis of the CRA and its implications for open source stewardship, with David explaining that that document had been reviewed by lawyers since it contains legal advice about CRA interpretations. Eric proposed using future funding to prepare materials for due diligence, but the group agreed to focus on factual statements about their current practices rather than making interpretive claims about CRA compliance. David raised concerns about the target audience for additional compliance features, noting that many Trusted Firmware members are SOC manufacturers rather than device vendors who would face direct CRA compliance requirements. The discussion concluded with questions about due diligence requirements and vulnerability reporting timelines, which David noted might be more aggressive than current practices.

The team discussed creating a new GitHub repository for prototyping PSA crypto drivers, with Frank explaining that the main reason was to align with most vendors' existing GitHub workflows. Antonio raised concerns about licensing issues and building/testing processes for the new repository. The group also learned about an existing PSA crypto API repository on Gerrit, but noted it doesn't address licensing requirements for code hosting. Dan noted the existing PSA Crypto API GitHub doesn't look suitable for code sharing as there is no license information.

The conversation ended with an announcement about a new Confidential Compute Working Group kickoff planned for the following week.