Trusted-services April 2026

trusted-services@lists.trustedfirmware.org

2 participants
3 discussions

by Govindraj Raja

Hi All, In preparation to the Firmware-A v2.12 bundle release the following TF-A/TF-A-tests/Hafnium/RMM/CI project tags were applied: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/refs/tags/v2.12-r… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/tf-a-tests/+/refs/tags/v2.12-rc0 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/tf-a-ci-scripts/+/refs/tags/v2.12-rc0 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/tf-a-job-configs/+/refs/tags/v2.12-rc0 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/hafnium/hafnium.git/+/refs/tags/v2.12-rc0 https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/hafnium-ci-scripts.git/+/refs/tags/v2.12… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/ci/hafnium-job-configs.git/+/refs/tags/v2.1… https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-RMM/tf-rmm/+/refs/tags/tf-rmm-v0.6.0-rc0 Trees are frozen still accepting security or bug fixes until the release close down happening end next week (hopefully!). For partners, it will help if tests are run against those trees on downstream platforms and spot any issue hit before the final tagging. -- Thanks, Govindraj R ________________________________ From: Govindraj Raja via TF-A-Tests <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 20:18 To: Joanna Farley via TF-A <tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>; tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Cc: hafnium(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <hafnium(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>; tf-rmm(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-rmm(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org>; trusted-services(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <trusted-services(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: [Tf-a-tests] Firmware-A v2.12 release code freeze notification Hi All, The next release of the Firmware-A bundle of projects tagged v2.12 has an expected code freeze date of Nov, 8th 2024. Refer to the release cadence section from TF-A documentation (https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/about/release-informatio…). Closing out the release takes around 6-10 working days after the code freeze. v2.12 release preparation tasks start from now. We want to ensure that planned feature patches for the release are submitted in good time for the review process to conclude. As a kind recommendation and a matter of sharing CI resources, please launch CI jobs with care e.g.: -For simple platform, docs changes, or one liners, use Allow-CI+1 label (no need for a full Allow-CI+2 run). -For large patch stacks use Allow-CI+2 at top of the patch stack (and if required few individual Allow+CI+1 labels in the middle of the patch stack). -Carefully analyze results and fix the change if required, before launching new jobs on the same change. -If after issuing a Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label a Build start notice is not added as a gerrit comment on the patch right away please be patient as under heavy load CI jobs can be queued and in extreme conditions it can be over an hour before the Build start notice is issued. Issuing another Allow-CI+1 or Allow-CI+2 label will just result in an additional job being queued. -- Thanks, Govindraj R -- TF-A-Tests mailing list -- tf-a-tests(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org To unsubscribe send an email to tf-a-tests-leave(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org

4 weeks

Firmware-A v2.15 release code freeze notification

by harrison.mutai＠arm.com

The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to multiple lists and previously handled on another list.

1 month, 4 weeks

How trusted Service to obtain the physical address of a buffer for DMA.

by Kummari, Prasad

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] Hi Team, I am working on a Trusted Service running under OP-TEE SPMC (FF-A based setup) on ARMv8. We are implementing a block storage service that reads data from OSPI flash using a DMA engine. Currently, the Trusted Service allocates a buffer and passes it to the DMA engine, but the read operation returns all zeros. I suspect this is because the buffer is a virtual address, while the DMA expects a physical address. My questions: 1. Is there a supported way for a Trusted Service to obtain the physical address of a buffer? 2. If not, what is the recommended approach for handling DMA in this context? Should this be done outside the Trusted Service using shared memory? Any guidance would be appreciated. Regards, Prasad.

2 months

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

Trusted-services April 2026