- TF-A - lists.trustedfirmware.org

Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.16 Release Announcement

by Varun Wadekar

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.16 is now available. This release contains the following patches. e80174ea9 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex X3 erratum 2641945 [1] a3cd44292 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A715 erratum 2561034 [2] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ia6d6ac8a66936c63b8aa8d7698b937f42ba8f… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I377f250a2994b6ced3ac7d93f947af6ceb690… Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Feb 8, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+1) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, Cancelling as no topic planned. Regards, Olivier." TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Feb 8, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Tr… Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://zoom.us/j/9159704974Meeting ID: 915 970 4974One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location        +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)        +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)        877 853 5247 US Toll-free        888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h   Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

MMIO with pre/post indexing instructions

by ff

Hi, I am using hypervisors to allow execution of EL3 code directly and had to deal with MMIO caused by instructions that have post-indexing parameters. Xen community had to deal with this in 2022: https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org/msg113335.html This does not cause any trouble and have implemented ways to deal with this expeditiously. Yet, I wonder if it is desirable to from a synchronisation perspective? Cheers FF Compiling TFA 2.10 for PLAT=a80x0_mcbin The following line https://elixir.bootlin.com/arm-trusted-firmware/v2.10.0/source/drivers/marv… Is compiled as: win_reg = mmio_read_32(AMB_WIN_CR_OFFSET(win_id)); 4026d9c: f9470260 ldr x0, [x19, #3584] 4026da0: 9100e002 add x2, x0, #0x38 4026da4: b9400001 ldr w1, [x0] win_reg &= ~WIN_ENABLE_BIT; 4026da8: 121f7821 and w1, w1, #0xfffffffe *(volatile uint32_t*)addr = value; // post-indexing 4026dac: b8008401 str w1, [x0], #8 #gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 10.3.0-1ubuntu1) 10.3.0 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. #objdump --version GNU objdump (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.36.1 Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. #I can’t get access to latests compiler and binutils versions to overcome # « ../.. array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of ‘volatile void[0] » # « ../.. has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions » # so I don’t know if this behaviour is changed when using this latests toolchain

1 year, 8 months

2
5
0 0

Handling of normal world interrupts with BL31 PSCI handler

by caleb.ethridge＠analog.com

Hello, If normal world interrupts are received while invoking TF-A's PSCI reset handler, we have observed that the reset can be aborted. In TF-A's PSCI reset handler, a call out to OP-TEE is made before performing the platform-specific reset: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/lib/psci/p… https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/services/s… When OP-TEE is entered, it is possible to receive foreign (normal world) interrupts, which invokes the procedure described here: https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/3.16.0/architecture/core.html#deliver-non-s… When the SMC call is aborted as described above, this results in the reboot failing. Linux does not retry the PSCI reset (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c#…). This makes sense because it is not expecting the SMC call to fail (it expected to make an uninterruptable SMC call into the secure monitor, not a call into OP-TEE). If OP-TEE itself is setup to handle PSCI reset calls, it also handles them in (uninterruptable) SMC context: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/master/core/arch/arm/sm/psci.c#L140 https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/master/core/arch/arm/sm/sm_a32.S#L96 Based on this, we see two possible solutions: a) Masking the non-secure interrupts in BL31 while we are doing a reset b) Removing the call to OPTEE in the reset handler so that we never leave the SMC context Which option do you suggest? Or are we missing an important detail here? Thanks, Caleb

1 year, 9 months

6
11
0 0

All if...else if constructs shall be terminated with an else statement.

by Nithin G

Hello, In the file /lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c. getting misra_c_2012_rule_15_7_violation: No non-empty terminating "else" statement. during the Coverity MISRA-C analysis. void cm_prepare_el3_exit(uint32_t security_state) { u_register_t sctlr_elx, scr_el3, mdcr_el2; if (security_state == NON_SECURE) { scr_el3 = read_ctx_reg(get_el3state_ctx(ctx), CTX_SCR_EL3); misra_c_2012_rule_15_7_violation: No non-empty terminating "else" statement. if ((scr_el3 & SCR_HCE_BIT) != 0U) { ... ... ... write_sctlr_el2(sctlr_elx); } else if (el_implemented(2) != EL_IMPL_NONE) { el2_unused = true; ... ... ... write_cnthp_ctl_el2(CNTHP_CTL_RESET_VAL & ~(CNTHP_CTL_ENABLE_BIT)); } manage_extensions_nonsecure(el2_unused, ctx); } cm_el1_sysregs_context_restore(security_state); cm_set_next_eret_context(security_state); } Resolution: added empty else statement to resolve the issue. diff --git a/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c b/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c index 8e6bfc5..8996746 100644 --- a/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c +++ b/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c @@ -789,6 +789,8 @@ void cm_prepare_el3_exit(uint32_t security_state) */ write_cnthp_ctl_el2(CNTHP_CTL_RESET_VAL & ~(CNTHP_CTL_ENABLE_BIT)); + } else { + /* To fix the MISRA 15.7 warning - Added an empty else statement */ } manage_extensions_nonsecure(el2_unused, ctx); } -- Is it possible to add an empty else statement in this code? Please suggest. Regards, Nithin G

1 year, 9 months

2
1
0 0

Fw: Trusted Firmware-A LTS v2.8.15 Release Announcement

by Yann GAUTIER - foss

Hello, Trusted Firmware-A LTS version 2.8.15 is now available. This release contains the following patches. 7185d051b fix(docs): add few missed links for Security Advisories [1] 10d738975 docs(security): security advisory for CVE-2023-49100 [2] fc08e1bc4 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex X3 erratum 2743088 [3] 70bd2640b fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X3 erratum 2302506 [4] eadc24b6b fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-X3 erratum 2266875 [5] 560f14075 fix(cpus): workaround for Cortex-A78C erratum 2683027 [6] bdb731568 docs(changelog): changelog for lts-v2.8.15 release [7] [1] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I9cab72b70a518273cbb1a291142f452198427… [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I13fa93a65e5017dae6c837e88cd80bda72d4c… [3] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I2c8577e3ca0781af8b1c3912e577d3bd77f92… [4] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I048b830867915b88afa36582c6da05734a56d… [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I9c610777e222f57f520d223bb03fc5ad05af1… [6] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/I2bf9e675f48b62b4cd203100f7df40f4846aa… [7] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/Ibb920e90a6f44a858b9f4709dbeb22e22ab86… Thanks, TF-A LTS team

1 year, 9 months

1
0
0 0

New ticketing system

by Sandrine Bailleux

Hi all, As you might have heard, developer.trustedfirmware.org is getting deprecated. TF-A project used to make (little) use of its issues tracker at [1]. In replacement, we suggest switching to the issues tracker associated with TF-A Github mirror at [2]. Similarly, for TF-A Tests and TF-A CI scripts repositories, we've now got Github mirrors for these projects as well and associated issues trackers at [3] and [4], which we'd like to start using. If you've opened tickets on developer.trustedfirmware.org in the past, could you please migrate them to Github? We might review the tickets list at some point and migrate remaining ones but your help would be much appreciated! TF-A and TF-A tests documentation are in the process of being updated (see [5] and [6]) to refer to the new ticketing system. Best regards, Sandrine [1] https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/project/board/1/ [2] https://github.com/TrustedFirmware-A/trusted-firmware-a/issues [3] https://github.com/TrustedFirmware-A/tf-a-tests/issues [4] https://github.com/TrustedFirmware-A/tf-a-ci-scripts/issues [5] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/26168 [6] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/tf-a-tests/+/26169

1 year, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Deprecating CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS build option.

by Govindraj Raja

Hi All, Please note build option CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS is now replaced with ENABLE_FEAT_MTE[1] To avoid breaking any builds for timebeing CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS usage will indirectly enable ENABLE_FEAT_MTE but will produce a build warning. Kindly request anyone using CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS to replace with ENABLE_FEAT_MTE As option CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS backward support will be removed after next release and going forward usage of CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS will not be handled within build. -- Thanks, Govindraj R [1]: https://review.trustedfirmware.org/q/topic:%22gr/refac_mte%22

1 year, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Canceled event with note: TF-A Tech Forum @ Thu Jan 25, 2024 5pm - 6pm (GMT+1) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Olivier Deprez

This event has been canceled with a note: "Hi, No topic proposed, cancelling. Thanks, Olivier. " TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Jan 25, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Tr… Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://zoom.us/j/9159704974Meeting ID: 915 970 4974One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location        +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)        +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)        877 853 5247 US Toll-free        888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h   Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Should strscpy() be preferred over strlcpy()?

by Sandrine Bailleux

Hi, Right now, TF-A coding guidelines advocate the use of strlcpy() over strcpy()/strncpy() (see the banned libc functions [1]) for the following reasons: - strlcpy() always null-terminates the destination string, even if it gets truncated. This is safer and less error-prone than leaving it unterminated like strncpy() does in this case. - With strlcpy(), it is possible to detect whether the string was truncated. This is useful in some use cases. - strlcpy() writes a single null-terminating byte into the destination string, whereas strncpy() wastes time writing multiple null-terminating bytes until it fills the destination string. Thus, strlcpy() is more efficient in the case where the source string is shorter than the destination one. There exists another string copy variant: strscpy(). Just like strlcpy(), it is not part of the C standard but most libc implementations provide it. strscpy() has the following advantages over strlcpy(): - strscpy() only reads the specified number of bytes from the source string, whereas strlcpy() reads all of its bytes until it finds a null-terminating byte (this is because it needs to return this information). This opens up a potential security risk if the source string is untrusted and controlled by an attacker, as we might end up reading a lot of memory if proper safeguards are not put in place on the source string prior to calling strlcpy(). Also it causes a performance penalty for reading "useless" bytes from the source string. - Checking for truncation is easier and less error-prone with strscpy() : strscpy() returns an error code (-E2BIG) in case of truncation, whereas strlcpy() requires comparing the return value with the destination string size. For these reasons, it seems to me we should prefer strscpy() over strlcpy() in TF-A code base. Any thoughts? Note that the Linux kernel coding style already goes in that direction. The coding style verification script (checkpatch.pl), which TF-A reuses, will print the following warning message if strlcpy() is used: WARNING: Prefer strscpy over strlcpy - see: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wgfRnXz0W3D37d01q3JFkr_i_uTL=V6A6G1oUZcprmk… This got flagged by the OpenCI into some TF-A code review already [2]. If we decide that strlcpy() is fine for TF-A codebase in the end, we'll at least need to find a way to silence this checkpatch.pl warning. AFAICS there is already a switch to this effect so it should just be a matter of adding '--ignore STRLCPY' inside .checkpatch.conf file. Best regards, Sandrine [1] https://trustedfirmware-a.readthedocs.io/en/latest/process/coding-guideline…) [2] https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/25551

1 year, 9 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

TF-A