- TF-A - lists.trustedfirmware.org

Updated invitation: TF-A Tech Forum @ Every 2 weeks from 9am to 10am on Thursday from Thu Mar 7 to Wed Jul 24 (MST) (tf-a@lists.trustedfirmware.org)

by Don Harbin

This event has been updated Changed: time TF-A Tech Forum Every 2 weeks from 9am to 10am on Thursday from Thursday Mar 7 to Wednesday Jul 24 Mountain Standard Time - Phoenix We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org View all guest info https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1… Reply for tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org and view more details https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NWlub3Ewdm1tMmk1… Your attendance is optional. ~~//~~ Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event. To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to send a response to the organizer, be added to the guest list, invite others regardless of their own invitation status, or modify your RSVP. Learn more https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Integrate TF-A and PSA Crypto API with PUFcc

by Andy Chen

Hi TF-A teams, This is Andy from PUFsecurity, and we have a project with ARM. We try to integrate the PSA Crypto API with PUFcc (Our Crypto Engine) on TF-A. However, there are multiple versions included, and we need your assistance for specification clarification. Please ensure the versions match your recommendations. For TF-A, we plan to integrate with: TF-A lts-v2.10.5 PSA Crypto API - v1.1.0 PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6 TF-A It would be beneficial to use the same hardware (FPGA) and tools as the ARM development team. If we can confirm which models are used for TF-A , scripts or details with the ARM hardware That would be grateful. PSA Crypto API - The test bench is using the PSA Crypto API v1.1.0, and it is published in 2022. And Now is v1.2.1 in March 2024. I not sure it is a good choose or not. [cid:0e747007-8c2a-49a7-9447-8d5e7f9a3e9c] Test Bench - For the "PSA Certified APIs Architecture Test Suite - v1.6," we would like to identify which test codes (test_c001 to test_c067) are relevant for TF-A. Thank you very much!!! Have a Nice Day, Andy [cid:74269c28-12d4-48a9-b215-3d3eaf95f2c3] 熵碼科技股份有限公司 Tel: 886-3-5601010 #2119 Email: andychen(a)pufsecurity.com<mailto:andychen@pufsecurity.com> Website: https://www.pufsecurity.com/ -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.-------- -------- Disclaimer: This e-mail is from PUFsecurity Corporation. This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system. Our postal address is 8F-1, No. 5, Tai-Yuan 1st St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302082, Taiwan.--------

1 year, 10 months

2
1
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum - Jul 25th 2024 - Unification of Chain of Trust Descriptors

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, On Jul 25th in the TF-A Tech Forum: Unification of Chain of Trust Descriptors - presented by Xialin Liu Currently, the Chain of Trust is implemented using C data structures built into the firmware or through device tree nodes. Maintaining both formats can lead to maintenance challenges. Therefore, we are standardizing the provision of Chain of Trust descriptors exclusively via the device tree and providing a tool to convert device tree descriptors into C source files. This approach simplifies the process, ensuring consistency and reducing the potential for errors associated with managing multiple formats. Regards, Olivier. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Jul 25, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Firmware Partition Filesystem query

by Ghennadi Procopciuc

Greetings everyone, I came across the following paragraph while reading the 'Firmware Partition Filesystem' chapter from EBBR v2.2.0 and I would like to clarify my understanding: Where possible, firmware images and data should be stored in a filesystem. Firmware can be stored either in a dedicated firmware partition, or in certain circumstances in the UEFI System Partition (ESP). Using a filesystem makes it simpler to manage multiple firmware files and makes it possible for a single disk image to contain firmware for multiple platforms. Dedicated firmware partitions should be formatted with a FAT filesystem as defined in UEFI § 13.3 File System Format. Dedicated firmware partitions should use the same /FIRMWARE directory hierarchy. OS tools shall ignore dedicated firmware partitions, and shall not attempt to use a dedicated firmware partition as an ESP Questions: 1. Does the above paragraph mean that, if the device allows, all firmware binaries (TF-A, U-Boot, and some others) must be stored in a dedicated firmware partition formatted with a FAT filesystem and GUID Partition Table (GPT) disk layout? 2. If so, would this also mean that, where possible, the BootROM or a (first stage) bootloader running before TF-A should have GPT and FAT support embedded support to load one of the TF-A stages (BL1/BL2)? Regards, Ghennadi

1 year, 10 months

5
7
0 0

Proper message for ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES case

by Bollapalli, Maheedhar Sai

Hi, On AMD-Xilinx ZynqMP platform for ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES case; the log appearing on the console is as below: "VERBOSE: BL31: cortex_a53: CPU workaround for erratum 819472was not applied". We checked ZynqMP code and found that the ZynqMP cpu revision was higher than the cpu revision intended in the erratum and hence it was not applicable and not applied. The message seems inappropriate to us as from log message it is not clear why it wasn't applied. Our suggestion is that in the log message instead of "not applied" it should be mentioned as "not applicable" as indicated below to reflect the reason properly. "VERBOSE: BL31: cortex_a53: CPU workaround for erratum 819472 was not applicable". Regards, Maheedhar.

1 year, 10 months

2
1
0 0

BL2 does find only 2 images

by Labs, Torsten

Hey all, i tried to setup a fip.bin and add 3 images (bl31, bl32 and bl33). ./fiptool --verbose create --soc-fw bl31.bin --nt-fw bl33.bin --tos-fw bl32.bin fip.bin When i check the generated fip.bin with fiptool info it shows me all my three images in the fip.bin EL3 Runtime Firmware BL31: offset=0xB0, size=0x13644, cmdline="--soc-fw" Secure Payload BL32 (Trusted OS): offset=0x136F4, size=0x18D864, cmdline="--tos-fw" Non-Trusted Firmware BL33: offset=0x1A0F58, size=0x9692E, cmdline="--nt-fw" But during bootup the BL2 finds only the image id =3 and image id=5 which is BL32 and BL33. Why he is not finding the bl32? Thanks for youre short help. Regards Torsten

1 year, 10 months

2
1
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum - Jul 11th 2024 - Using the SMC Fuzzing Module in TF-A

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, This Thursday Jul 11th Kathleen Capella from Arm's TF-A team will present: **Using the SMC Fuzzing Module in TF-A** This presentation will show how you might get started with fuzz testing using the SMC fuzzing module in TF-A. I will demonstrate the basic fuzzer features, how to add SMC calls/test cases and how to make use of the module's integration with tf-a-tests and the TF-A CI. Regards, Olivier. TF-A Tech Forum Thursday Jul 11, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 6pm Central European Time - Paris We run an open technical forum call for anyone to participate and it is not restricted to Trusted Firmware project members. It will operate under the guidance of the TF TSC. Feel free to forward this invite to colleagues. Invites are via the TF-A mailing list and also published on the Trusted Firmware website. Details are here: https://www.trustedfirmware.org/meetings/tf-a-technical-forum/Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/my/trustedfirmware?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09 One tap mobile+16465588656,,9159704974# US (New York)+16699009128,,9159704974# US (San Jose)Dial by your location +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) 877 853 5247 US Toll-free 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ad27hc6t7h Guests marek.bykowski(a)gmail.com okash.khawaja(a)gmail.com tf-a(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org

1 year, 10 months

2
1
0 0

TF-A Tech Forum - Jul 18th 2024 - NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework

by Olivier Deprez

Hi, On Thursday Jul 18th 2024 Rohit Mathew from Arm's Infra solutions team will present: ** NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework: Enhancing Latency and Storage Efficiency** With the increasing prevalence of multi-chip platforms, it is crucial for software written for Trusted Firmware-A to be NUMA-aware. The PER-CPU framework addresses this need by distributing the allocation of per-CPU objects across different NUMA nodes. This approach reduces NUMA latency and balances the allocation load, leading to improved performance and efficiency. Regards, Olivier. NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework: Enhancing Latency and Storage Efficiency Thursday Jul 18, 2024 ⋅ 5pm – 5:50pm Central European Time - Paris Location zoom, see dial-in information below https://www.google.com/maps/search/zoom,+see+dial-in+information+below?hl=en NUMA-Aware PER-CPU Framework: Enhancing Latency and Storage EfficiencyWith the increasing prevalence of multi-chip platforms, it is crucial for software written for Trusted Firmware-A to be NUMA-aware. The PER-CPU framework addresses this need by distributing the allocation of per-CPU objects across different NUMA nodes. This approach reduces NUMA latency and balances the allocation load, leading to improved performance and efficiency.Dial In Information:Trusted Firmware is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.Join Zoom Meetinghttps://linaro-org.zoom.us/j/9159704974?pwd=VktXcm5MNUUyVVM4R0k3ZUtvdU84QT09Meeting ID: 915 970 4974Passcode: Mj6NdM---One tap mobile+13462487799,,9159704974# US (Houston)+16694449171,,9159704974# US---Dial by your location• +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)• +1 669 444 9171 US• +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)• +1 719 359 4580 US• +1 253 205 0468 US• +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)• +1 646 931 3860 US• +1 689 278 1000 US• +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)• +1 305 224 1968 US• +1 309 205 3325 US• +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)• +1 360 209 5623 US• +1 386 347 5053 US• +1 507 473 4847 US• +1 564 217 2000 US• +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)• 833 548 0276 US Toll-free• 833 548 0282 US Toll-free• 833 928 4608 US Toll-free• 833 928 4609 US Toll-free• 833 928 4610 US Toll-free• 877 853 5247 US Toll-free• 888 788 0099 US Toll-freeMeeting ID: 915 970 4974Find your local number: https://linaro-org.zoom.us/u/aZXJZYXK

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Native compilation failed on dev board not able to find the gcc

by Anand Moon

Hi All, I am trying to compile the latest ATF on Raspberry Pi 5 but it fails. This is the same for all the other Arm64 architecture I have. Earlier versions of ATF were able to compile on-board with native gcc. Well with CROSS_COMPILE it works fine on x86_64 machine. alarm@raspberrypi:~/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a$ make PLAT=rpi5 DEBUG=1 make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 C compiler could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 C compiler is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this C compiler as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 C preprocessor could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 C preprocessor is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this C preprocessor as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 assembler could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 assembler is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this assembler as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 linker could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 linker is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armclang` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armlink` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM Clang (`clang`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM LLD (`lld`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU GCC (`gcc`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU LD (`ld.bfd`) make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this linker as GNU GCC (`gcc`). make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 object copier could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objcopy make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 object copier is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objcopy make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `fromelf` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM `llvm-objcopy` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU `objcopy` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this object copier as GNU `objcopy`. make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 object dumper could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objdump make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 object dumper is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-objdump make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `fromelf` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM `llvm-objdump` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU `objdump` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this object dumper as GNU `objdump`. make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The configured AArch64 archiver could not be identified and may not be supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc-ar make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The default AArch64 archiver is: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: aarch64-none-elf-gcc-ar make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The following tools are supported: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - Arm® Compiler for Embedded `armar` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - LLVM `llvm-ar` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: - GNU `ar` make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: The build system will treat this archiver as GNU `ar`. make_helpers/toolchain.mk:344: /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-none-elf-gcc: not found /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-none-elf-gcc: not found CC bl31/bl31_context_mgmt.c make: aarch64-none-elf-gcc: No such file or directory make: *** [Makefile:1514: /home/alarm/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a/build/rpi5/debug/bl31/bl31_context_mgmt.o] Error 127 alarm@raspberrypi:~/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a$ alarm@raspberrypi:~/Downloads/trusted-firmware-a$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 12.2.0-14' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-12/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-12 --program-prefix=aarch64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --enable-libphobos-checking=release --with-target-system-zlib=auto --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=aarch64-linux-gnu --host=aarch64-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.2.0 (Debian 12.2.0-14) Thanks -Anand

1 year, 10 months

3
7
0 0

Re: Questions about the Fault Handling of GPFs

by Olivier Deprez

Hi Feifan Qian, Trapping GPF to EL3 is permitted by the architecture, however I don't believe TF-A provides such option. In general for TF-A's reference software stacks, a GPF is trapped first at EL2 (hence SCR_EL3.GPF=0). E.g. In a system implementing RME, the RMM (@ R-EL2) traps a GPF occurring in an R-EL1/0 Realm (or R-EL2 itself). Similarly, in the secure world, the SPM (@ S-EL2) traps a GPF occurring in a S-EL1/0 secure partition (or S-EL2 itself). Regards, Olivier. ________________________________ From: 钱非凡 <qianfeifan(a)iie.ac.cn> Sent: 01 July 2024 08:52 To: tf-a-owner(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org <tf-a-owner(a)lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: Questions about the Fault Handling of GPFs Dear experts, I have been learning the Fault Handling of the Granule Protection Fault in Arm CCA. Upon studying the Arm Document, I discovered that the GPF bit in the SCR_EL3 register controls whether the fault handling of GPFs occurs in EL3 or not. In addition, I noted that `include/arch/aarch64/arch.h` defines a macro `#define SCR_GPF_BIT (UL(1) << 48)`, yet I could not find any reference to this macro in the source code. I want to know that whether ATF has implemented the fault handling of GPFs or if this is a feature to be expected in the future. If its not, how can I implement this. Any guidance or advice you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Feifan Qian

1 year, 10 months

1
0
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

TF-A